A Minicon poll

[kevingaustin]

[Poll #1959780]

Comments

As a followup question

[kaustin.livejournal.com]

If it is the 47th anniversary of Minicon 1 that is being celebrated, why would that be considered a "big" anniversary?

[magentamn.livejournal.com]

I thought it was going to be the 50th Minicon; the count does not agree with the number of years because there were a couple of years with 2 Minicons.

[bibliofile.livejournal.com]

All of the above, and then some?

[laurel]

You're goofy.

[laurel]

So what you're saying is, we should just celebrate the 50th Minicon and not the anniversary of something that happened 50 years ago? You literal-minded goofball.

Also how long did you search for something that happened 50 years prior to the 50th Minicon? Maybe Wikipedia makes it easy to do that now.

[mle292.livejournal.com]

"being a big anniversary will not attract any additional members",

It's almost like you're quoting someone who has a history of being a bit apeshit with the budgeting, and might have some after-the-fact justification. Either that or I'm projecting my own feelings onto this.

[kaustin.livejournal.com]

It's from the second paragraph of the Budget section on page two of the Minicon 50 proposal that I linked to.

[mle292.livejournal.com]

Yes it is. There are many quotable sentences in that proposal.