Page Summary
sashibala.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lsanderson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
joelrosenberg.livejournal.com - Haven't looked at the numbers
cakmpls.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sraun - (no subject)
kaustin.livejournal.com - Re: Haven't looked at the numbers
davidschroth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cakmpls.livejournal.com - (no subject)
joelrosenberg.livejournal.com - Re: Haven't looked at the numbers
joelrosenberg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cakmpls.livejournal.com - (no subject)
joelrosenberg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-03-08 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-08 01:33 pm (UTC)And people vote for these whacks?
Haven't looked at the numbers
Date: 2004-03-08 01:39 pm (UTC)I'd really like to take a look at numbers, but a quick googling isn't helpful. The Metro Transit website talks about 231,000 "boardings" per weekday, but if that's true, substituting cars for any good percentage of those should be crowding the roads dreadfully, particularly during rush hour.
Me, I'd like to wave a magic wand and put heavy rail under the Cities. Anybody got a magic wand handy?
no subject
Date: 2004-03-08 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-08 02:11 pm (UTC)He's an arrogant a$$hole.
Re: Haven't looked at the numbers
Date: 2004-03-08 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-08 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-08 05:05 pm (UTC)Re: Haven't looked at the numbers
Date: 2004-03-08 08:25 pm (UTC)Orthogonally: I remember, some years ago, looking at the numbers for retrofit modifications to busses and subways in NYC, and realizing that the supposed extremists who were claiming that it would be cheaper for the city to simply give unlimited cab service to the disabled were, in fact, correct.
I like the *idea* of good, inexpensive, public transportation, and I think that it's a reasonable thing to spend some tax dollars on. But I really would like to know what we're buying, and how much it's costing.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-12 01:45 pm (UTC)Think ACTUP, say, would have gotten the same attention if they'd said, "you know, I think that the Catholic Church should reconsider its advocacy against the use of condoms" that they did with the "the pope is a war criminal!" stuff?
Orthogonally: news today is that the Pawlenty administration is freeing up something like $100K per week, for the duration of the strike, to pay for transportation for the indigent; the immediate reaction from the union is that it's an unfair, union-busting tactic. Apparently, indigent paraplegics, say, are supposed to be calling Metro Transit, begging them to settle with the union, rather than going to the doctor.
Lot of "lack of heart" going around.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-12 02:17 pm (UTC)I think that the union's phrasing of their reaction was ill-advised, but I think there is a union-busting component in this. The union shouldn't have made that their main point, however. They could have said they were happy to see the citizens most in need being taken care of, pointed out that the $100,000 a week will take care of the transportation needs of only some, and then said that there was a union-busting feel to this "solution."
no subject
Date: 2004-03-12 04:57 pm (UTC)The union was being insensitively honest: the idea of a public workers strike is that it so inconveniences or endangers the less well-off public that the other side simply has to make a better offer. (Different from a private sector strike; there, the main threat is that competitors will grab market and market share while the strike goes on.) It's supposed to result in poor cripples calling in, saying "I'll die if you don't settle," and it's very much hardball. (I'm not saying that it's wrong, mind you, just that it's hardball.) Where the union screwed up was in admitting that they care just as little about the poor cripples as the management does.
But, sure, you're right: they should have said something like, "How very horrible, and while we're glad that these people who so badly need transportation will be able to get it, we're scared that some might fall through the safety net. Let's hope that management comes to its senses and ups their offer to something livable before they miss somebody, who dies as a result," and then continue privately hoping and praying that they get a few bodies, real quick.
Cynical? Me?